Fizzics, featuring Neapolitan Pale, Ice Cream Pale Ale

Previously I have reviewed Fizzics Waytap, but this time it’s time to test their big brother: Fizzics. Advantages primarily relate to the size – up to a 64oz growler can be put into this beast of a machine, but first, the beer review.


Mandatory “Neapolitan Pale” Facts

  • Untappd Rating: 3.29 (at time of writing)
  • ABV: 6.2%
  • IBU: 30
  • Style: Pale Ale (Ice Cream Pale Ale)
  • Serving: Bottle, 440 ml

Northern Monk are the producers of this fun and colourful-looking can. Ice cream and milkshake-related beers are increasing in popularity: I’m certainly not against this, as I have really been enjoying these varieties. Examples of previous ice-cream and milkshake brews are available here; Milshake IPA, Patrons 2.05.

Surprised by the name, Neapolitan, which is synonymous with the trilogy of ice cream flavours: strawberry, vanilla and chocolate. I split the beer between Fizzics and a standard pouring glass, with just over 200ml in each. The glass held a light amber beer, with a moderately hazy appearance. Scents of the beer were non-descript, with typical pale ale tones. On sampling, primarily vanilla came through – an increasingly desired taste of mine. Though usually craving the exotic flavours of passionfruit, mango and citrus, a huge vanilla hit was extremely delicious. I didn’t get much else on first sampling, but as I savoured the drink further, I noticed a slight chocolate note, though the strawberry remained absent from my palate.


 Rating: 3.0/5. “Neapolitan Pale” is not as good as I had expected. It has the flavours of Neapolitan ice cream, but they remain subtle and subtle isn’t what I have come to expect from Northern Monk beers. I feel that this beer has the potential to explode into something phenomenal: it just needs a greater chocolate intensity (though I appreciate this remains difficult to incorporate into a pale ale beer, as dark malts are needed to create this) and a big injection of strawberry. As it stands – this beer would taste sensational if you had a strawberry dipped in chocolate with which to accompany it!



Firstly, I want to thank Fizzics for the complimentary product. This is the original version, which looks like a spaceship when placed on top of my beer counter – yeah, it’s a thing, just roll with it! For a review of their second product, the smaller, sleeker Fizzics Waytap see here. The principle behind Fizzics is to re-create the draught sensation in the home. It does this by using sound waves to create a “true foam head” which helps with aromas – ultimately the most defining feature in beer flavour and analysis.

I really like Fizzics Waytap, but I had a few issues with the product:

  • The device burnt through batteries incredibly quickly
  • There were size limitations
  • Remnants were often left in the container

I put the can into the empty chamber: this size of can would have been slightly too big to be used within Waytap. The head of the device flipped over, allowing the can/bottle/growler to be easily placed into the bottom. It takes 4xAA batteries for Fizzics to work its magic. The first half of “Neapolitan Pale” was drawn from Fizzics, but I poured the second half of into the aforementioned glass, giving the best direct comparison. From Fizzics, the foam head was more pronounced and I could easily confirm that the aromas were greater and more intense: it smelled slightly sweeter, reflecting the ice cream connotations. On sampling, the Fizzics beer was lighter, smoother, maintained a creamier mouthfeel and the strawberry taste was no longer absent. The technology worked! Yes, it probably isn’t as good as a true draught variant, but did it give a boost in comparison to the canned brew sitting next to it? Definitely. I did a blind taste test with my partner and she correctly guessed the Fizzics version, so there really does seem to be a noticeable difference!


Direct comparisons between the original and Waytap:

  • Too soon to tell about the batteries (I take the batteries about between uses)
  • I used a mid-sized can for this beer, but the product size is much bigger than their Waytap variety – a big positive!
  • Both products leave remnants in the original container
  • The design of Fizzics isn’t as aesthetically pleasing as Fizzics Waytap (this has certainly been improved for the second generation product).

Rating: 4.25/5.  “Fizzics” is great; the main reason this product loses marks is purely due to appearances. It works well and makes the beer better; therefore, of course Dr Beer is going to score this highly!

Now to see if I can take this into a bar for a draught vs bottle vs can vs Fizzics battle!

Let’s see what Fizzics themselves have to say about all things beer on their feature of Meet the Makers.



One thought on “Fizzics, featuring Neapolitan Pale, Ice Cream Pale Ale

Add yours

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Powered by

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: